Lewis Clark Credit Union
Lewiston, ID·Charter 68386·cu:68386·Credit union RBC / net worth
- #13 of 26Total assets in Idaho
- 21.9Kmembers
Performance over time
7 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
Credit union · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
No material changes against peers this quarter
0 of 24 FORFI signals stand out against 770 similar credit unions, based on NCUA data for the quarter.
Where Lewis Clark Credit Union differs most from peers
Share and deposit costs among the highest of similar credit unionsContext: Funding1.94%peers 1.30%+64 bps
Lewis Clark Credit Union's cost of all shares and deposits was 1.94%, compared with a median of 1.30% among 770 similar credit unions: higher than 87% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of all shares and deposits | ||
| 1.94% | 1.30% | +64 bps |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Lewis Clark Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Fee and other noninterest income among the highest of similar credit unionsContext: Earnings1.70%peers 1.02%+68 bps
Lewis Clark Credit Union's noninterest income relative to average assets was 1.70%, compared with a median of 1.02% among 770 similar credit unions: higher than 84% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Noninterest income relative to average assets | ||
| 1.70% | 1.02% | +68 bps |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Lewis Clark Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Loan-to-share ratio among the highest of similar credit unionsContext: Liquidity87.5%peers 71.2%+16.3 pp
Lewis Clark Credit Union's loans as a share of shares and deposits was 87.5%, compared with a median of 71.2% among 770 similar credit unions: higher than 83% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Loans as a share of shares and deposits | ||
| 87.5% | 71.2% | +16.3 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Lewis Clark Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Key facts
- Lewis Clark Credit Union is a state-chartered credit union headquartered in Lewiston, Idaho. It reported $270 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Shares and deposits totaled $239 million, up 5.7% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $209 million, up 3.8%.
- Its net interest margin on average assets was 3.82% and its annualized return on assets was 0.75% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all shares and deposits was 1.94%, compared with a median of 1.30% among 770 similar credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets.
- It served 21,902 members, down 0.8% from a year earlier.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Lewis Clark Credit Union's own data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors and relationships drive the change in funding, and what to offer them next.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Lewis Clark Credit Union · Credit union
- NCUA charter
- 68386
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Lewis Clark Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
NCUA · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation |
|---|---|
| $509.86K | |
| $3.77M | |
| $1.17M | |
| $2.6M | |
| $1.16M | |
| $2.96M | |
| $283.1K | |
| $283.38K | |
| 0.75% | |
| 3.82% | |
| 78.88% |
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-16T13:43:41.229347+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.