Conservation Employees Credit Union
Jefferson City, MO·Charter 64199·cu:64199·Credit union RBC / net worth
Performance over time
7 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
Credit union · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at Conservation Employees Credit Union
1 of 25 FORFI signals stand out against 770 similar credit unions, based on NCUA data for the quarter.
Efficiency ratio falling while the peer median risesStrength: Efficiency 2nd quarter59.6%peers 77.0%-17.3 pp
Conservation Employees Credit Union's efficiency ratio fell 14.3 percentage points over the past year to 59.6%. Among 770 similar credit unions, the median rose 0.4 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency ratio | ||
| 59.6% | 77.0% | -17.3 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| -14.3 pp | +0.4 pp | -14.6 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Conservation Employees Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Where Conservation Employees Credit Union differs most from peers
Net interest margin among the lowest of similar credit unionsContext: Earnings2.77%peers 3.78%-101 bps
Conservation Employees Credit Union's net interest margin on average assets was 2.77%, compared with a median of 3.78% among 770 similar credit unions: lower than 94% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Net interest margin on average assets | ||
| 2.77% | 3.78% | -101 bps |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Conservation Employees Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Shares and deposits growing faster than peersContext: Funding+9.8%peers +3.5%+6.3 pp
Conservation Employees Credit Union's shares and deposits grew 9.8% over the past year to $177 million. The median among 770 similar credit unions was +3.5%.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Shares and deposits, 12-month growth | ||
| +9.8% | +3.5% | +6.3 pp |
| Shares and deposits | ||
| $177 million | ||
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Conservation Employees Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Key facts
- Conservation Employees Credit Union is a state-chartered credit union headquartered in Jefferson City, Missouri. It reported $195 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Shares and deposits totaled $177 million, up 9.8% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $123 million, up 5.3%.
- Its net interest margin on average assets was 2.77% and its annualized return on assets was 1.28% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all shares and deposits was 2.01%, compared with a median of 1.30% among 770 similar credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets.
- It served 9,531 members, up 1.9% from a year earlier.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Conservation Employees Credit Union's own data, FORFI would look at: Where revenue per relationship falls short of the cost to serve it.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Conservation Employees Credit Union · Credit union
- NCUA charter
- 64199
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 770 credit unions with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Conservation Employees Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
NCUA · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation |
|---|---|
| $616.58K | |
| $2.21M | |
| $878.23K | |
| $1.33M | |
| $252.96K | |
| $946.57K | |
| $23.91K | |
| $23.91K | |
| 1.28% | |
| 2.77% | |
| 59.64% |
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-16T13:43:41.229347+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.