Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union
Livonia, MI·Charter 5554·cu:5554·Credit union RBC / net worth
Performance over time
7 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
Credit union · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union
6 of 23 FORFI signals stand out against 2478 similar credit unions, based on NCUA data for the quarter.
Funding pressure buildingWorth a look: Funding FORFI signal0.83%peers 0.91%-7 bps
Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union's cost of shares and deposits has not eased the way it has at similar credit unions, while more of the funding base moved into higher-rate time deposits.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of all shares and deposits | ||
| 0.83% | 0.91% | -7 bps |
| Certificates' share of shares | ||
| 20.2% | 12.7% | +7.5 pp |
With internal data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors repriced or moved balances, which relationships are at risk of migrating, and where exception pricing is concentrated.
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 2478 credit unions with under $100 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Efficiency ratio rising faster than peersWorth a look: Efficiency116.3%peers 79.8%+36.6 pp
Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union's efficiency ratio rose 64.5 percentage points over the past year to 116.3%. Among 2444 similar credit unions, the median rose 2.5 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency ratio | ||
| 116.3% | 79.8% | +36.6 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| +64.5 pp | +2.5 pp | +62.0 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 2478 credit unions with under $100 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Membership growing while the peer median shrinksStrength: Membership+10.5%peers -1.4%+11.9 pp
Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union's membership grew 10.5% over the past year. The median among 2473 similar credit unions was -1.4%.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Membership, 12-month growth | ||
| +10.5% | -1.4% | +11.9 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 2478 credit unions with under $100 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Return on assets falling faster than peersWorth a look: Earnings-1.09%peers 0.72%-182 bps
Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union's annualized return on assets fell 321 bps over the past year to -1.09%. Among 2470 similar credit unions, the median fell 11 bps.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized return on assets | ||
| -1.09% | 0.72% | -182 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| -321 bps | -11 bps | -310 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 2478 credit unions with under $100 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
2 more observations
- Reliance on share certificates rising while the peer median holds steadyFunding
- Share and deposit costs rising while the peer median holds steadyFunding
Key facts
- Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union is a federally chartered credit union headquartered in Livonia, Michigan. It reported $75.0 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Shares and deposits totaled $62.4 million, down 1.9% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $26.4 million, down 8.9%.
- Its net interest margin on average assets was 3.45% and its annualized return on assets was -1.09% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all shares and deposits was 0.83%, compared with a median of 0.91% among 2475 similar credit unions with under $100 million in assets.
- It served 4,541 members, up 10.5% from a year earlier.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union's own data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors repriced or moved balances, which relationships are at risk of migrating, and where exception pricing is concentrated.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union · Credit union
- NCUA charter
- 5554
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 2478 credit unions with under $100 million in assets that filed NCUA data for the same quarter. Michigan Columbus Federal Credit Union itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
NCUA · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation |
|---|---|
| -$204.81K | |
| $775.87K | |
| $130.13K | |
| $645.74K | |
| $324.69K | |
| $1.13M | |
| $46.52K | |
| $46.52K | |
| -1.09% | |
| 3.45% | |
| 116.31% |
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-16T13:43:41.229347+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.