West Michigan Community Bank
Hudsonville, MI·RSSD 715340·FDIC 22308·bank:715340·CBLR opted in
- #14 of 74Total assets in Michigan
- 8offices
- 105employees
- Top 10%Deposit growth in the U.S.
- #9 of 65Efficiency in Michigan
- #8 of 35C&I loan growth in Michigan
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at West Michigan Community Bank
4 of 24 FORFI signals stand out against 629 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Funding pressure buildingWorth a look: Funding FORFI signal2.22%peers 1.93%+30 bps
West Michigan Community Bank's cost of deposits has not eased the way it has at similar banks, while noninterest-bearing deposits lost share.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of all deposits | ||
| 2.22% | 1.93% | +30 bps |
| Share of deposits that pay no interest | ||
| 21.0% | 19.5% | +1.5 pp |
With internal data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors repriced or moved balances, which relationships are at risk of migrating, and where exception pricing is concentrated.
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 629 banks with $1 billion to $3 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. West Michigan Community Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Net charge-offs falling while the peer median holds steadyStrength: Asset quality0.00%peers 0.02%-2 bps
West Michigan Community Bank's annualized net charge-off rate fell 114 bps over the past year to 0.00%. Among 623 similar banks, the median was essentially unchanged.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized net charge-off rate | ||
| 0.00% | 0.02% | -2 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| -114 bps | 0 bps | -114 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 629 banks with $1 billion to $3 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. West Michigan Community Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Where West Michigan Community Bank differs most from peers
Return on assets rising faster than peersContext: Earnings1.54%peers 1.26%+28 bps
West Michigan Community Bank's annualized return on assets rose 60 bps over the past year to 1.54%. Among 628 similar banks, the median rose 14 bps.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized return on assets | ||
| 1.54% | 1.26% | +28 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| +60 bps | +14 bps | +46 bps |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 629 banks with $1 billion to $3 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. West Michigan Community Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
2 more observations
- Noninterest-bearing deposit share falling faster than peersFunding
- Deposit costs rising while the peer median fallsFunding
Key facts
- West Michigan Community Bank is a bank headquartered in Hudsonville, Michigan. It reported $1.2 billion in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $1.1 billion, up 15.5% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $1.0 billion, up 12.7%.
- Its net interest margin was 3.84% and its annualized return on assets was 1.54% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 2.22%, compared with a median of 1.93% among 625 similar banks with $1 billion to $3 billion in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With West Michigan Community Bank's own data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors repriced or moved balances, which relationships are at risk of migrating, and where exception pricing is concentrated.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- West Michigan Community Bank · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 715340
- FDIC certificate
- 22308
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 629 banks with $1 billion to $3 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. West Michigan Community Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| $4.63M | — | |
| $17.17M | — | |
| $6.3M | — | |
| $10.87M | — | |
| $1.42M | — | |
| $6.39M | — | |
| $115K | — | |
| $115K | — | |
| 1.54% | 1.54%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 3.84% | 3.82%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 52.00% | 52.00%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.