Texas National Bank
Sweetwater, TX·RSSD 1435092·FDIC 34014·bank:1435092·Risk-based ratios where reported
- #292 of 352Total assets in Texas
- 2offices
- 24employees
- Top 6%Lowest cost of deposits in the U.S.
- Top 7%Margin improvement in the U.S.
- Top 8%Loan quality vs. peers
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at Texas National Bank
1 of 26 FORFI signals stand out against 1223 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Unrealized securities position improving faster than peersStrength: Capital 2nd quarter-40.6%peers -7.0%-33.6 pp
Texas National Bank's unrealized securities gain or loss relative to Tier 1 capital rose 16.4 percentage points over the past year to -40.6%. Among 1222 similar banks, the median rose 2.9 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealized securities gain or loss relative to Tier 1 capital | ||
| -40.6% | -7.0% | -33.6 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| +16.4 pp | +2.9 pp | +13.4 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Texas National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Where Texas National Bank differs most from peers
Loan-to-deposit ratio among the lowest of similar banksContext: Liquidity33.6%peers 77.5%-43.9 pp
Texas National Bank's loans as a share of deposits was 33.6%, compared with a median of 77.5% among 1213 similar banks: lower than 97% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Loans as a share of deposits | ||
| 33.6% | 77.5% | -43.9 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Texas National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Efficiency ratio among the highest of similar banksContext: Efficiency88.5%peers 63.2%+25.3 pp
Texas National Bank's efficiency ratio was 88.5%, compared with a median of 63.2% among 1220 similar banks: higher than 93% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency ratio | ||
| 88.5% | 63.2% | +25.3 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Texas National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Key facts
- Texas National Bank is a bank headquartered in Sweetwater, Texas. It reported $139 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $128 million, down 1.4% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $43.0 million, up 18.3%.
- Its net interest margin was 3.22% and its annualized return on assets was 0.42% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 0.91%, compared with a median of 1.68% among 1213 similar banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Texas National Bank's own data, FORFI would look at: Which balance-sheet segments consume or release capital, relationship by relationship.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Texas National Bank · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 1435092
- FDIC certificate
- 34014
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Texas National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| $145K | — | |
| $1.32M | — | |
| $293K | — | |
| $1.02M | — | |
| $237K | — | |
| $1.12M | — | |
| $0 | — | |
| $0 | — | |
| 0.42% | 0.41%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 3.22% | 3.22%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 88.49% | 88.49%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.