Midwest Regional Bank
Clayton, MO·RSSD 691958·FDIC 8889·bank:691958·Risk-based ratios where reported
- #39 of 195Total assets in Missouri
- 7offices
- 136employees
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at Midwest Regional Bank
8 of 24 FORFI signals stand out against 1437 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Deposits shrinking while the peer median growsWorth a look: Funding 2nd quarter-14.5%peers +4.3%-18.8 pp
Midwest Regional Bank's deposits declined 14.5% over the past year to $840 million. The median among 1435 similar banks was +4.3%.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Deposits, 12-month growth | ||
| -14.5% | +4.3% | -18.8 pp |
| Deposits | ||
| $840 million | ||
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Midwest Regional Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Loans shrinking while the peer median growsNotable: Lending 2nd quarter-16.8%peers +5.5%-22.3 pp
Midwest Regional Bank's loans declined 16.8% over the past year to $766 million. The median among 1431 similar banks was +5.5%.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Loans, 12-month growth | ||
| -16.8% | +5.5% | -22.3 pp |
| Loans | ||
| $766 million | ||
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Midwest Regional Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Net charge-offs rising while the peer median holds steadyWorth a look: Asset quality5.90%peers 0.00%+590 bps
Midwest Regional Bank's annualized net charge-off rate rose 581 bps over the past year to 5.90%. Among 1427 similar banks, the median was essentially unchanged.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized net charge-off rate | ||
| 5.90% | 0.00% | +590 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| +581 bps | 0 bps | +581 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Midwest Regional Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Return on assets falling while the peer median risesWorth a look: Earnings-3.46%peers 1.32%-478 bps
Midwest Regional Bank's annualized return on assets fell 346 bps over the past year to -3.46%. Among 1433 similar banks, the median rose 14 bps.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized return on assets | ||
| -3.46% | 1.32% | -478 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| -346 bps | +14 bps | -360 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Midwest Regional Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Efficiency ratio falling faster than peersStrength: Efficiency69.0%peers 60.8%+8.2 pp
Midwest Regional Bank's efficiency ratio fell 13.1 percentage points over the past year to 69.0%. Among 1432 similar banks, the median fell 2.1 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency ratio | ||
| 69.0% | 60.8% | +8.2 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| -13.1 pp | -2.1 pp | -11.0 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Midwest Regional Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
3 more observations
- Deposit costs among the highest of similar banksFunding
- Deposit costs falling faster than peersFunding
- Problem loans rising while the peer median holds steadyAsset quality
Key facts
- Midwest Regional Bank is a bank headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It reported $949 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $840 million, down 14.5% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $766 million, down 16.8%.
- Its net interest margin was 3.61% and its annualized return on assets was -3.46% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 3.18%, compared with a median of 1.80% among 1432 similar banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Midwest Regional Bank's own data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors and relationships drive the change in funding, and what to offer them next.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Midwest Regional Bank · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 691958
- FDIC certificate
- 8889
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Midwest Regional Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| -$8.36M | — | |
| $14.82M | — | |
| $6.74M | — | |
| $8.07M | — | |
| $1.95M | — | |
| $6.91M | — | |
| $13.82M | — | |
| $13.76M | — | |
| -3.46% | -3.45%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 3.61% | 3.60%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 69.01% | 69.01%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.