Cedar Hill National Bank
Charlotte, NC·RSSD 2651899·FDIC 34478·bank:2651899·Risk-based ratios where reported
- #39 of 39Total assets in North Carolina
- 1offices
- 18employees
- Top 7%Return on assets vs. peers
- Top 9%Fee income vs. peers
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
Portfolio detail unavailable
This source does not provide mapped loan categories for this filing.
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
No material changes against peers this quarter
0 of 20 FORFI signals stand out against 583 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Where Cedar Hill National Bank differs most from peers
Loan-to-deposit ratio among the lowest of similar banksContext: Liquidity0.0%peers 66.9%-66.9 pp
Cedar Hill National Bank's loans as a share of deposits was 0.0%, compared with a median of 66.9% among 544 similar banks: lower than 98% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Loans as a share of deposits | ||
| 0.0% | 66.9% | -66.9 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 583 banks with under $100 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Cedar Hill National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Noninterest-bearing deposit share among the lowest of similar banksContext: Funding0.0%peers 23.1%-23.1 pp
Cedar Hill National Bank's share of deposits that pay no interest was 0.0%, compared with a median of 23.1% among 543 similar banks: lower than 98% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Share of deposits that pay no interest | ||
| 0.0% | 23.1% | -23.1 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 583 banks with under $100 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Cedar Hill National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Unrealized securities position worsening while the peer median improvesContext: Capital-0.1%peers -3.2%+3.0 pp
Cedar Hill National Bank's unrealized securities gain or loss relative to Tier 1 capital fell 0.5 percentage points over the past year to -0.1%. Among 574 similar banks, the median rose 1.4 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealized securities gain or loss relative to Tier 1 capital | ||
| -0.1% | -3.2% | +3.0 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| -0.5 pp | +1.4 pp | -1.9 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 583 banks with under $100 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Cedar Hill National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Key facts
- Cedar Hill National Bank is a bank headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. It reported $16.0 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $2.0 million, up 0.0% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $0.
- Its net interest margin was 3.91% and its annualized return on assets was 5.04% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 2.01%, compared with a median of 1.51% among 538 similar banks with under $100 million in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Cedar Hill National Bank's own data, FORFI would look at: Which relationships could bring deposits to fund the loan book.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Cedar Hill National Bank · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 2651899
- FDIC certificate
- 34478
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 583 banks with under $100 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Cedar Hill National Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| $198K | — | |
| $146K | — | |
| $10K | — | |
| $136K | — | |
| $547K | — | |
| $431K | — | |
| $0 | — | |
| $0 | — | |
| 5.04% | 5.03%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 3.91% | 3.90%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 63.10% | 63.10%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.