Bank of Estes Park
Estes Park, CO·RSSD 550354·FDIC 19351·bank:550354·CBLR opted in
- #46 of 63Total assets in Colorado
- 3offices
- 27employees
- Top 8%Loan quality vs. peers
- #9 of 57Lowest cost of deposits in Colorado
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at Bank of Estes Park
3 of 24 FORFI signals stand out against 1223 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Funding pressure buildingWorth a look: Funding FORFI signal1.09%peers 1.68%-59 bps
Bank of Estes Park's cost of deposits has not eased the way it has at similar banks, while more of the funding base moved into higher-rate time deposits.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of all deposits | ||
| 1.09% | 1.68% | -59 bps |
| Time deposits' share of deposits | ||
| 29.5% | 33.2% | -3.7 pp |
With internal data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors repriced or moved balances, which relationships are at risk of migrating, and where exception pricing is concentrated.
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Bank of Estes Park itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Where Bank of Estes Park differs most from peers
Problem loans among the lowest of similar banksContext: Asset quality0.00%peers 0.38%-38 bps
Bank of Estes Park's noncurrent loans as a share of loans was 0.00%, compared with a median of 0.38% among 1207 similar banks: lower than 92% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Noncurrent loans as a share of loans | ||
| 0.00% | 0.38% | -38 bps |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Bank of Estes Park itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Leverage capital ratio falling while the peer median risesContext: Capital10.84%peers 11.34%-0.5 pp
Bank of Estes Park's leverage ratio fell 0.5 percentage points over the past year to 10.84%. Among 1222 similar banks, the median rose 0.1 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage ratio | ||
| 10.84% | 11.34% | -0.5 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| -0.5 pp | +0.1 pp | -0.7 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Bank of Estes Park itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
2 more observations
- Reliance on CDs rising while the peer median holds steadyFunding
- Deposit costs rising while the peer median fallsFunding
Key facts
- Bank of Estes Park is a bank headquartered in Estes Park, Colorado. It reported $172 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $155 million, up 11.1% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $96.8 million, up 0.4%.
- Its net interest margin was 4.33% and its annualized return on assets was 1.67% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 1.09%, compared with a median of 1.68% among 1213 similar banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Bank of Estes Park's own data, FORFI would look at: Which depositors repriced or moved balances, which relationships are at risk of migrating, and where exception pricing is concentrated.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Bank of Estes Park · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 550354
- FDIC certificate
- 19351
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Bank of Estes Park itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| $685K | — | |
| $2.07M | — | |
| $404K | — | |
| $1.66M | — | |
| $110K | — | |
| $1.01M | — | |
| $75K | — | |
| $75K | — | |
| 1.67% | 1.66%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 4.33% | 4.32%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 57.13% | 57.13%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.