Yampa Valley Bank
Steamboat Spring, CO·RSSD 2806635·FDIC 35407·bank:2806635·CBLR opted in
- #14 of 63Total assets in Colorado
- 2offices
- 76employees
- #3 of 57Return on assets in Colorado
- #10 of 57Efficiency in Colorado
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
No material changes against peers this quarter
0 of 26 FORFI signals stand out against 1437 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Where Yampa Valley Bank differs most from peers
Return on assets among the highest of similar banksContext: Earnings2.55%peers 1.32%+123 bps
Yampa Valley Bank's annualized return on assets was 2.55%, compared with a median of 1.32% among 1434 similar banks: higher than 94% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized return on assets | ||
| 2.55% | 1.32% | +123 bps |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Yampa Valley Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Noninterest-bearing deposit share falling faster than peersContext: Funding28.5%peers 20.5%+8.0 pp
Yampa Valley Bank's share of deposits that pay no interest fell 2.0 percentage points over the past year to 28.5%. Among 1432 similar banks, the median fell 0.1 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Share of deposits that pay no interest | ||
| 28.5% | 20.5% | +8.0 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| -2.0 pp | -0.1 pp | -1.9 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Yampa Valley Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Efficiency ratio among the lowest of similar banksContext: Efficiency48.2%peers 60.8%-12.6 pp
Yampa Valley Bank's efficiency ratio was 48.2%, compared with a median of 60.8% among 1433 similar banks: lower than 85% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency ratio | ||
| 48.2% | 60.8% | -12.6 pp |
Not a flagged change: this is where the institution sits furthest from similar institutions this quarter. Peers: 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Yampa Valley Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Key facts
- Yampa Valley Bank is a bank headquartered in Steamboat Spring, Colorado. It reported $688 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $614 million, up 6.1% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $537 million, up 4.3%.
- Its net interest margin was 4.56% and its annualized return on assets was 2.55% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 1.90%, compared with a median of 1.80% among 1432 similar banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Yampa Valley Bank's own data, FORFI would look at: Which relationships and products drive the change in earnings, and where pricing has drifted.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Yampa Valley Bank · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 2806635
- FDIC certificate
- 35407
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 1437 banks with $300 million to $1 billion in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Yampa Valley Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| $4.36M | — | |
| $10.59M | — | |
| $3.02M | — | |
| $7.57M | — | |
| $534K | — | |
| $3.9M | — | |
| -$109K | — | |
| -$383K | — | |
| 2.55% | 2.54%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 4.56% | 4.55%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 48.17% | 48.17%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.