Twin Cedars Bank
Bussey, IA·RSSD 750444·FDIC 1556·bank:750444·Risk-based ratios where reported
- #187 of 227Total assets in Iowa
- 4offices
- 21employees
Performance over time
23 available quarters · Gaps indicate missing data · Reported period-end total assets; consolidated for FFIEC 031.
Inside the balance sheet
FDIC reported categories · Shares of reported gross loans. Missing components are not treated as zero.
What stands out at Twin Cedars Bank
7 of 24 FORFI signals stand out against 1223 similar banks, based on FDIC data for the quarter.
Efficiency ratio rising while the peer median fallsWorth a look: Efficiency 2nd quarter141.1%peers 63.2%+77.9 pp
Twin Cedars Bank's efficiency ratio rose 73.1 percentage points over the past year to 141.1%. Among 1216 similar banks, the median fell 2.1 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency ratio | ||
| 141.1% | 63.2% | +77.9 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| +73.1 pp | -2.1 pp | +75.3 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Twin Cedars Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Return on assets falling while the peer median risesWorth a look: Earnings 2nd quarter-4.40%peers 1.26%-566 bps
Twin Cedars Bank's annualized return on assets fell 517 bps over the past year to -4.40%. Among 1222 similar banks, the median rose 14 bps.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized return on assets | ||
| -4.40% | 1.26% | -566 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| -517 bps | +14 bps | -531 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Twin Cedars Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Net charge-offs rising while the peer median holds steadyWorth a look: Asset quality 2nd quarter2.86%peers 0.00%+286 bps
Twin Cedars Bank's annualized net charge-off rate rose 285 bps over the past year to 2.86%. Among 1206 similar banks, the median was essentially unchanged.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized net charge-off rate | ||
| 2.86% | 0.00% | +286 bps |
| 12-month change | ||
| +285 bps | 0 bps | +285 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Twin Cedars Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Deposit costs among the highest of similar banksWorth a look: Funding 2nd quarter3.11%peers 1.68%+143 bps
Twin Cedars Bank's cost of all deposits was 3.11%, compared with a median of 1.68% among 1213 similar banks: higher than 96% of them.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of all deposits | ||
| 3.11% | 1.68% | +143 bps |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Twin Cedars Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
Leverage capital ratio falling while the peer median risesWorth a look: Capital9.19%peers 11.34%-2.1 pp
Twin Cedars Bank's leverage ratio fell 2.2 percentage points over the past year to 9.19%. Among 1222 similar banks, the median rose 0.1 percentage points.
| This institution | Peer median | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage ratio | ||
| 9.19% | 11.34% | -2.1 pp |
| 12-month change | ||
| -2.2 pp | +0.1 pp | -2.4 pp |
FORFI flags a change when an institution sits in the outer tail of similar institutions and the gap is large enough to matter. Peers: 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Twin Cedars Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile. How signals work
2 more observations
- Net interest margin narrowing while the peer median widensEarnings
- Problem loans rising while the peer median holds steadyAsset quality
Key facts
- Twin Cedars Bank is a bank headquartered in Bussey, Iowa. It reported $118 million in total assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2026.
- Deposits totaled $105 million, up 6.0% from a year earlier, and loans totaled $90.8 million, down 3.4%.
- Its net interest margin was 3.95% and its annualized return on assets was -4.40% for the quarter.
- Its cost of all deposits was 3.11%, compared with a median of 1.68% among 1213 similar banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets.
Scorecard against peers
Capitalization
Liquidity & funding
Margin & yield
Income & expense
Asset quality
Charge-offs & allowance
Arrows show whether the value sits above or below the peer median. Colour shows whether that side is favourable for the measure: green favourable, red unfavourable, grey where neither side is (for example, a lower loan-to-core-deposit ratio is favourable, so a negative gap is green). Peer medians cover the same source, form, period, institution type and asset band, and count this institution in its own cohort. The peer line on every chart reads the same cohort. Regulatory definitions differ from FORFI quarterly estimates.
Watch items
Screening prompts computed from this filing only. Thresholds follow common review conventions and interagency concentration references; they are not supervisory ratings or predictions.
Public filings show what changed. Internal data shows why.
With Twin Cedars Bank's own data, FORFI would look at: Where revenue per relationship falls short of the cost to serve it.
Analysis workspaces
Sources and identifiers
- Institution
- Twin Cedars Bank · Bank
- Federal Reserve RSSD
- 750444
- FDIC certificate
- 1556
- Reporting period
- Peer group
- 1223 banks with $100 million to $300 million in assets that filed FDIC data for the same quarter. Twin Cedars Bank itself is left out of every peer median and percentile.
Figures are FORFI calculations from public regulatory filings, shown as reported. Signals are descriptive screening rules, not supervisory ratings, credit opinions or forecasts. Methodology
Income & calculation basis
FDIC · 2026-04-01 through 2026-06-30 · Annualization factor 4.010989 applies to ROA and margin only.
| Measure | FORFI calculation | FDIC published reference |
|---|---|---|
| -$1.29M | — | |
| $1.9M | — | |
| $804K | — | |
| $1.1M | — | |
| $42K | — | |
| $1.61M | — | |
| $1.23M | — | |
| $1.24M | — | |
| -4.40% | -4.38%ROAQ · Quarter | |
| 3.95% | 3.94%NIMYQ · Quarter | |
| 141.12% | 137.79%EEFFQR · adjusted · Quarter |
Credit-quality reconciliation · Source components agree. NALNLS (nonaccrual) + P9LNLS (90+ days accruing) = NCLNLS (noncurrent).
How to interpret differences
Flows cover the selected income window. Balance-sheet amounts, members and staffing are as of the filing date.
Published FDIC references use the regulator's own averaging, annualization and adjustments; the convention selector changes FORFI calculations only. Source-provided averages are used when available; endpoint fallbacks are labeled estimates.
Missing inputs remain unavailable. Credit-union margins use average assets and are not comparable with bank margins over earning assets.
AFS + HTM securities exclude deposits at other institutions. Broader investment totals may overlap cash; do not add them to cash without reconciling components.
Regulatory source definitionsFiling imported 2026-09-25T00:32:31.073937+00:00. Separate reference provenance is included in the export.